It's easy to get caught up in a Sports Centre version of politics where we cheer for our team, but political theory helps us go deeper and understand the new reality of Canadian politics.
All of Canada's problems are the direct result of letting women vote.
It was the MATRIARCHY, not the patriarchy, that forced lockdowns and deadly mRNA injections in the name of "safety", let in foreign exploiters in the name of "sympathy" and "diversity", and crippled the economy in the name of "protecting the environment".
These problems are all downstream of anti-fascism's victory in WWII, which was pretty much unrelated to the female vote. Neither men nor women voted en masse for their countries to be flooded with non-Whites, and yet it happened anyway.
Women did indeed vote for their countries to be flooded with sexy foreign men who can and do physically dominate their own men. Forcing men to fight for women like themselves turns them on, intensely.
Usually they are childless, and somehow mothering is part of this psychopathology. Angela Merkel is Exhibit A. She personally imported millions of young violent Muslim men, solely for the sexual thrill. They don't work, so the economic argument is invalid. Having no children of her own, she really couldn't care less what happens to Germany.
We have a similar situation in the US, but with young violent Hispanic men, and the aging childless women who adore them.
This is such an extremely old story that even chimpanzees patrol their borders to prevent their females from mating with outsiders. And the females will indeed mate with them at the first opportunity, because by penetrating the border, outsiders have proved their dominance, and dominance is what turns them on.
This is not to say that "anti-fascism" is irrelevant. The winners assumed that Naziism was caused by having distinct nations, and therefore that all nations (except one specific one) must be obliterated by globalism to prevent fascism.
I see your Angela Merkel and raise you a Joe Biden. Joe Biden is a man, not a woman, who effectively opened the American border to anyone who wanted to cross for 4 years. Biden is not an aging childless woman. My anecdote cancels out yours.
The crux of my argument is that the decision to flood White countries with non-Whites, which has happened across the Western world and is clearly coordinated in some way, was not a result of female voting and likely would have happened even if women didn't have the right to vote.
Your response was just to say Angela Merkel let in a bunch of brown men in 2015, almost 70 years after this process had been set in motion in the Western world, and that therefore women voting was the cause. This doesn't make sense because Merkel showed up way after the decision to turn the West brown had been set in motion. Sure, she accelerated it, but so did Joe Biden.
Mass remigration is the only answer. Apparently 5 million on temporary visas...easy enough to not renew those. That's almost half of the deluge in the past ten years.
By speaking up and standing firm. By making being a male feminist or sympathizer shameful and uncool. By making it known that we aren't going to go along with the nonsense anymore just to make some women feel better or more important. By not pretending men and women are equal. By making the idea that there should be equal representation in the workplace known for the nonsense that it is. By making natalism and family cool again. By not being afraid to be strong, powerful and dominant. For starters...
Mass remigration is the only answer. Apparently 5 million on temporary visas...easy enough to not renew those. That's almost half of the deluge in the past ten years.
There is no adjustment. There is no fight against this save one. And that is what America is doing. Deportation. All of them. No exceptions. But in order to do that we have to go against the powers that be that deliberately did this invasion, for that is what that is, in order to destabilise the nation and essentially take over. And they will resist all attempts to limit their power. They will not roll over and give up. This is not accidental, there was a purpose to this.
I really appreciate the plain spoken and direct language used in this piece, no half measures or prevarications. It is gutsy and sometimes guts are enough.
Catastrophe for Canada and it is too late. The Parti Québécois will ride this very phenomenon to victory in the upcoming referendum. They will say look what they have done to themselves.
I’ve also noticed some interesting dynamics with this election. It starts with Carney as their great hope, when they couldn’t push grey haired white men out fast enough in 2015, and then his nod to British heritage. He’s sour-pussed, nasty and radical, but so are a lot of Canadian boomers.
The Conservatives have put out a lot of signals that they are the party of ethnic strivers and it may have backfired. Their slogans of Axe the Tax, Build the Homes and Stop the Crime are low IQ. I don’t want them to build homes for these migrants- I want them to be sent back.
Boomer selfishness is very strong, but I think another dynamic is that traditional Canadians can’t survive in the new corner-cutting, ethnically based small business economy. They have to take refuge with big business and government.
The Liberals have gone pretty far with their quota systems and anti-white policies, such as cutting white males out of academia and career advancement and two-tier justice. They started cutting back slightly on their immigration insanity before the election. If they start walking this back then we’ll know something is up.
I think the other problem is that Canadians don’t trust the Conservatives to run a pork barrel economy. If the government is going to be picking winners and industries to survive tariffs, Ontarians don’t trust Albertans to do it.
You are correct in your assessment of the Conservatives. Can the Liberals make the pivot for real remains to be seen. But the Laurentians still have firm enough institutional control that it is possible if they are willing. The interesting thing is that increasingly heritage Canadians are seeing the light in regards to immigration. There is just so much up in the air right now.
You could have skipped the first page of PoMo waffle but the rest of the article makes solid points.
But John Carter is right about the ends and the means. Mass deportation. If the Laurentians finally realise their grave error then maybe it will actually happen.
While I find this very interesting, eye opening, and not all that hard to believe, I'd feel a bit better if I saw some sources. Is there anywhere you can point me to learn more about these new power structures, or even the old ones? You mention the Laurentian Elite a lot, but I've never heard of them before starting to read the Red Ensign. Is that a definable group?
You haven’t heard about them because they don’t really advertise. But if you read Canadian history, the are talked about a fair bit. When I was active in working on electoral campaigns, this was an often discussed topic, especially during the period of the merge between the PC and Reform to become the CPC. There were real concerns that the Laurentians in the PC Party would subvert the new CPC. George Grant, for one, talks about them a fair bit. And this is a big part of why we are doing this. To make people aware of political realities that get beyond the surface level talk.
I just picked up Lament for a Nation and am just getting started on it. It’s exciting to find some Canadian political content that feels really substantial and important - something I had imagined just didn’t exist. If you have any other specific sources I could look into I’d appreciate the recommendations.
I think that no matter how this election goes we are going to start seeing deep political divides and even larger tensions.Clearly the country has been run into the ground. It feels like both sides are in a truce right now waiting for the election.
It is clear that nobody has the balls to really do anything about the situation. A globalist banker and a liberal life long politician are not the cure for the country.
I wish the PPC could actually be a contender in this race like other populist movements but that doesn’t seem likely.
The only way to stop the Indians from taking over is violence. Let me repeat that: the only way to stop the Indians from taking over is violence.
Violence is how they maintain power structures in India. They will do the same in Canada. If you try to fight them in the pitched battles of bureaucratic and corporate politics, they will win eventually with numbers and networks.
They have to be first prevented from entering Canada and then actively discriminated against. This is not a nice proposition. I don’t like that it is this way, but it is this way. The power structure that you describe as having existed in the past are being swept aside because they had become sclerotic.
In order to save Canada in any coherent form, those power structures will have to be destroyed. The Laurentian elite simply cannot continue. Period. Not possible. Perhaps if all of the old power centers unite and then use violence, state power, something new can arise that Atleast absorbs the old elites. But none of them can survive as they are.
Now…. I don’t think any of this is possible. I think Canada is likely cooked. It is possible that portions might break away eventually (I could see the Albertans breaking away once the juice is no longer worth the squeeze). But without an acceptance that force will have to be used, Canada is destined to become New India.
As for the Laurentian handling of tribal groups, they're going to try to use them but I don't think they know what they're messing with. Sikh Defense Minister Sajjan ordering the rescue of non Canadian Sikhs in Afghanistan is an example of how shamelessly those emplaced by their tribe will repay them. At root politics is patronage, Europeans have just abstracted it beyond recognition.
Restrictions on cousin marriage date to the Roman empire. I think it's both a result and reinforcement of clannish behavior. If Europeans go in this direction too, it seems likely.
Eventually yes, Canada (and the rest of the Anglosphere) will revert to ethnically-based tribal politics, but it’s way too soon to ascribe Carney’s ascent to that dynamic. In the US, where the racial replacement is more advanced than in Canada, Trump is merely the gentlest ripple of that wave. White share of population will fall much further before explicitly pro-white politics comes on the stage.
Carney represents something much simpler: everyone, including the Laurentians, could read a poll and see the Liberals were headed for an historic wipeout. So they did what every tarnished brand does: swap the packaging, put up an “under new management” banner, and hope people have short memories (they do).
Wmj, solid post, I agree with your judgement but I question if the USofA has a higher percentage of foreign immigrants than Canada. I thought the idiotic liberal government allowed in 12-13million in 9 years.
It could be that. I don’t disagree. But my instincts are saying there might be more to it than this. They may be ineffectual because they are not willing to do actual hard things, but if they can do it in a managerial way — just fix the glitch — they try that way first.
There is zero chance of this realignment happening. Every Western country where mass ethnic immigration/invasion has been tried has resulted in the overthrow of the White native population. This is always abetted and encouraged by the White elite power structure, and it is certainly not racist to point this out--it's a fact. Canada will not continue for much longer as an Anglo/French culture--they don't have the stomach for it, any more than the English or Western European cultures have fought back against this civilizational destruction.
I am going to push back on this. Because of the Laurentian’s near total control of the bureaucracy and the requirement to speak both French and English, the administrative levers of government will remain closed to the vast majority of Indians. While the Laurentian’s may not have the stomach for forced remigration and deportations, there are plenty of administrative mechanisms they can use to contain Indian influence. The question of how real this pivot actually is remains an open question, but because the Laurentians are not “populist,” they have significant levers at their disposal if they wish to employ them.
Let's say young Indians coming up through the Canadian educational system see the value in learning French to get on certain career tracks, then that hurdle can be overcome. Even more threatening, the young are put on this path as a part of a tribal strategy to infuse the bureaucracy with their own.
There are painstaking mechanisms in place in the Canadian administrative state to avoid bias in hiring. I'm wondering how the Indians are kept out. Are you suggesting that there is more to the hiring process than meets the eye?
There is a certain segment of the Indian immigrant community, the high achieving strivers, who will be willing to learn French and all that, but typically they have chosen the STEM path for success. And I do think that there is enough under the surface prejudices at work across business and government so as to retain control. But that cannot hold forever if they do nothing. It’s early, and much remains uncertain, but I do think that if the Laurentians begin acting to curb immigrant influence, they will have the support of the people.
How, exactly, do we know the Laurentians don't have the stomach for forced remigration and deportations? They had plenty of stomach to ruin the lives of hundreds of thousands of children with lockdowns. They had plenty of stomach to build quarantine camps. They had plenty of stomach for mass arrests and beatings during the truck protest.
I don't think we have enough evidence yet to decide where things stand here, but rejecting out of hand the idea that the Laurentian Elite have the capacity to be cruel is to mistake them for other, softer, global Progressives.
Now explain how the Laurentians, having fully supported and encouraged the Trudeau regime and its policies of unchecked and unvetted immigration, have now seen the errors of their ways. I’ll wait…
Things change. Situations change. Elites do not maintain power over time without being able to adapt. They made an error. On the surface it looks like we are seeing early signs that they are recognizing this. It could be all fake and gay. But there are pieces appearing here and there, one recently in the Economist of all places, that are beginning to make the case against immigration. If the international set have begun to pivot as well it will make the job of the Laurentian’s pivot easier because they will not be going up against elite opinion elsewhere. And their participation in making it happen in the first place will just be memory holed. This is how power works. Can they pull it off? Is it real? Much remains uncertain, but it is clear that something is changing and has been for a while. I have been picking up on signals and writing about this since last year.
I don’t think its too late for England. It might be too late to do something without there being violence, but I still hold out some small hope for the future of the West, England included.
I don’t, (have hope) we’ve passed the post, the west has drowned itself and the newbies have no reason to assimilate. It’s numbers, to many in to short a time, it’s their country now.
On a more positive note, I am usually wrong on this stuff, so…
I don't know if you've been to Canada, but it looks exactly like videos that Englishmen post to demonstrate the state of English cities. Canada is demographically like London, basically everywhere now.
All of Canada's problems are the direct result of letting women vote.
It was the MATRIARCHY, not the patriarchy, that forced lockdowns and deadly mRNA injections in the name of "safety", let in foreign exploiters in the name of "sympathy" and "diversity", and crippled the economy in the name of "protecting the environment".
Smash the matriarchy!
These problems are all downstream of anti-fascism's victory in WWII, which was pretty much unrelated to the female vote. Neither men nor women voted en masse for their countries to be flooded with non-Whites, and yet it happened anyway.
Women did indeed vote for their countries to be flooded with sexy foreign men who can and do physically dominate their own men. Forcing men to fight for women like themselves turns them on, intensely.
Usually they are childless, and somehow mothering is part of this psychopathology. Angela Merkel is Exhibit A. She personally imported millions of young violent Muslim men, solely for the sexual thrill. They don't work, so the economic argument is invalid. Having no children of her own, she really couldn't care less what happens to Germany.
We have a similar situation in the US, but with young violent Hispanic men, and the aging childless women who adore them.
This is such an extremely old story that even chimpanzees patrol their borders to prevent their females from mating with outsiders. And the females will indeed mate with them at the first opportunity, because by penetrating the border, outsiders have proved their dominance, and dominance is what turns them on.
This is not to say that "anti-fascism" is irrelevant. The winners assumed that Naziism was caused by having distinct nations, and therefore that all nations (except one specific one) must be obliterated by globalism to prevent fascism.
I see your Angela Merkel and raise you a Joe Biden. Joe Biden is a man, not a woman, who effectively opened the American border to anyone who wanted to cross for 4 years. Biden is not an aging childless woman. My anecdote cancels out yours.
The crux of my argument is that the decision to flood White countries with non-Whites, which has happened across the Western world and is clearly coordinated in some way, was not a result of female voting and likely would have happened even if women didn't have the right to vote.
Your response was just to say Angela Merkel let in a bunch of brown men in 2015, almost 70 years after this process had been set in motion in the Western world, and that therefore women voting was the cause. This doesn't make sense because Merkel showed up way after the decision to turn the West brown had been set in motion. Sure, she accelerated it, but so did Joe Biden.
Sure, Joe was all for whatever boosts corporate profits at the expense of the US working class.
But I still say that the sexual thoughts of women were essential to carrying out the plan, along with weaponized empathy.
"70 years after this process had been set in motion" Did something happen in 1955?
I was referring to the postwar order established in 1945 - 70 years before the 2015 migrant crisis.
OK, but I don't know of any evidence that there were plans to flood German with Muslim migrants at that time.
What makes you think it was planned back in 1945?
Mass remigration is the only answer. Apparently 5 million on temporary visas...easy enough to not renew those. That's almost half of the deluge in the past ten years.
Yes, but that mass remigration cannot happen as long as women vote by their easily manipulated emotions. But do they ever vote for any other reason?
Sure it can, the women just need be made to fall in line.
How to do that?
By speaking up and standing firm. By making being a male feminist or sympathizer shameful and uncool. By making it known that we aren't going to go along with the nonsense anymore just to make some women feel better or more important. By not pretending men and women are equal. By making the idea that there should be equal representation in the workplace known for the nonsense that it is. By making natalism and family cool again. By not being afraid to be strong, powerful and dominant. For starters...
Mass remigration is the only answer. Apparently 5 million on temporary visas...easy enough to not renew those. That's almost half of the deluge in the past ten years.
There is no adjustment. There is no fight against this save one. And that is what America is doing. Deportation. All of them. No exceptions. But in order to do that we have to go against the powers that be that deliberately did this invasion, for that is what that is, in order to destabilise the nation and essentially take over. And they will resist all attempts to limit their power. They will not roll over and give up. This is not accidental, there was a purpose to this.
In essence, Canadians have to nut up.
I really appreciate the plain spoken and direct language used in this piece, no half measures or prevarications. It is gutsy and sometimes guts are enough.
Thanks!
Catastrophe for Canada and it is too late. The Parti Québécois will ride this very phenomenon to victory in the upcoming referendum. They will say look what they have done to themselves.
I completely agree with the analysis that we are moving to a more tribal politics due to the fuck ups of the Canadian government (Laurentian Elites).
My only critic is with the dynamic change.
I do think that the leaders are desperately trying to turn the page.
But I don't think the base is ready to change the page.
What exactly are they ditching?
Like yes there has been some talk of limiting immigration. But we are still going to mass build homes for foreigners.
We are still importing foreigners.
We are still doing gender ideology.
Sure Carbon tax is "gone" b
But mostly we have just had a role back on the excesses of Progressivism.
Like we have hit the consolidation phase after 9 years of expansion phase.
While I agree that it would make sense to put the woke away and change the paradigm (they clearly havent) politics is not always logical.
(NDP collapse in my mind is more due to Jagmeet corruption and spending on himself).
I’ve also noticed some interesting dynamics with this election. It starts with Carney as their great hope, when they couldn’t push grey haired white men out fast enough in 2015, and then his nod to British heritage. He’s sour-pussed, nasty and radical, but so are a lot of Canadian boomers.
The Conservatives have put out a lot of signals that they are the party of ethnic strivers and it may have backfired. Their slogans of Axe the Tax, Build the Homes and Stop the Crime are low IQ. I don’t want them to build homes for these migrants- I want them to be sent back.
Boomer selfishness is very strong, but I think another dynamic is that traditional Canadians can’t survive in the new corner-cutting, ethnically based small business economy. They have to take refuge with big business and government.
The Liberals have gone pretty far with their quota systems and anti-white policies, such as cutting white males out of academia and career advancement and two-tier justice. They started cutting back slightly on their immigration insanity before the election. If they start walking this back then we’ll know something is up.
I think the other problem is that Canadians don’t trust the Conservatives to run a pork barrel economy. If the government is going to be picking winners and industries to survive tariffs, Ontarians don’t trust Albertans to do it.
You are correct in your assessment of the Conservatives. Can the Liberals make the pivot for real remains to be seen. But the Laurentians still have firm enough institutional control that it is possible if they are willing. The interesting thing is that increasingly heritage Canadians are seeing the light in regards to immigration. There is just so much up in the air right now.
You could have skipped the first page of PoMo waffle but the rest of the article makes solid points.
But John Carter is right about the ends and the means. Mass deportation. If the Laurentians finally realise their grave error then maybe it will actually happen.
PoMo?
Postmodernist
😉
Gilgamesh, you Canadian, or just bouncing around in here because of John Carter
A little bit of both.
While I find this very interesting, eye opening, and not all that hard to believe, I'd feel a bit better if I saw some sources. Is there anywhere you can point me to learn more about these new power structures, or even the old ones? You mention the Laurentian Elite a lot, but I've never heard of them before starting to read the Red Ensign. Is that a definable group?
The old family compact.
You haven’t heard about them because they don’t really advertise. But if you read Canadian history, the are talked about a fair bit. When I was active in working on electoral campaigns, this was an often discussed topic, especially during the period of the merge between the PC and Reform to become the CPC. There were real concerns that the Laurentians in the PC Party would subvert the new CPC. George Grant, for one, talks about them a fair bit. And this is a big part of why we are doing this. To make people aware of political realities that get beyond the surface level talk.
I just picked up Lament for a Nation and am just getting started on it. It’s exciting to find some Canadian political content that feels really substantial and important - something I had imagined just didn’t exist. If you have any other specific sources I could look into I’d appreciate the recommendations.
We'll be doing some additional reviews of specific content as we go along. We'll do our best.
That is one of our goals, to gather up something of a canon of reliable works on Canada. Historian Donald Creighton would be a good place to start.
Perfect. I had already ordered his biography of Sir John A MacDonald.
I think that no matter how this election goes we are going to start seeing deep political divides and even larger tensions.Clearly the country has been run into the ground. It feels like both sides are in a truce right now waiting for the election.
It is clear that nobody has the balls to really do anything about the situation. A globalist banker and a liberal life long politician are not the cure for the country.
I wish the PPC could actually be a contender in this race like other populist movements but that doesn’t seem likely.
The problem that the PPC faces is that Canada is not a populist country.
The only way to stop the Indians from taking over is violence. Let me repeat that: the only way to stop the Indians from taking over is violence.
Violence is how they maintain power structures in India. They will do the same in Canada. If you try to fight them in the pitched battles of bureaucratic and corporate politics, they will win eventually with numbers and networks.
They have to be first prevented from entering Canada and then actively discriminated against. This is not a nice proposition. I don’t like that it is this way, but it is this way. The power structure that you describe as having existed in the past are being swept aside because they had become sclerotic.
In order to save Canada in any coherent form, those power structures will have to be destroyed. The Laurentian elite simply cannot continue. Period. Not possible. Perhaps if all of the old power centers unite and then use violence, state power, something new can arise that Atleast absorbs the old elites. But none of them can survive as they are.
Now…. I don’t think any of this is possible. I think Canada is likely cooked. It is possible that portions might break away eventually (I could see the Albertans breaking away once the juice is no longer worth the squeeze). But without an acceptance that force will have to be used, Canada is destined to become New India.
Tribal behavior is correlated with consanguinity (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Global_prevalence_of_consanguinity.svg) , Christian Europeans have long had restrictions on this behavior.
As for the Laurentian handling of tribal groups, they're going to try to use them but I don't think they know what they're messing with. Sikh Defense Minister Sajjan ordering the rescue of non Canadian Sikhs in Afghanistan is an example of how shamelessly those emplaced by their tribe will repay them. At root politics is patronage, Europeans have just abstracted it beyond recognition.
The real question is will Europeans reintegrate the concept at some point?
Restrictions on cousin marriage date to the Roman empire. I think it's both a result and reinforcement of clannish behavior. If Europeans go in this direction too, it seems likely.
Eventually yes, Canada (and the rest of the Anglosphere) will revert to ethnically-based tribal politics, but it’s way too soon to ascribe Carney’s ascent to that dynamic. In the US, where the racial replacement is more advanced than in Canada, Trump is merely the gentlest ripple of that wave. White share of population will fall much further before explicitly pro-white politics comes on the stage.
Carney represents something much simpler: everyone, including the Laurentians, could read a poll and see the Liberals were headed for an historic wipeout. So they did what every tarnished brand does: swap the packaging, put up an “under new management” banner, and hope people have short memories (they do).
Wmj, solid post, I agree with your judgement but I question if the USofA has a higher percentage of foreign immigrants than Canada. I thought the idiotic liberal government allowed in 12-13million in 9 years.
It could be that. I don’t disagree. But my instincts are saying there might be more to it than this. They may be ineffectual because they are not willing to do actual hard things, but if they can do it in a managerial way — just fix the glitch — they try that way first.
There is zero chance of this realignment happening. Every Western country where mass ethnic immigration/invasion has been tried has resulted in the overthrow of the White native population. This is always abetted and encouraged by the White elite power structure, and it is certainly not racist to point this out--it's a fact. Canada will not continue for much longer as an Anglo/French culture--they don't have the stomach for it, any more than the English or Western European cultures have fought back against this civilizational destruction.
Yup,🎯, Gord F speaks for me.
I am going to push back on this. Because of the Laurentian’s near total control of the bureaucracy and the requirement to speak both French and English, the administrative levers of government will remain closed to the vast majority of Indians. While the Laurentian’s may not have the stomach for forced remigration and deportations, there are plenty of administrative mechanisms they can use to contain Indian influence. The question of how real this pivot actually is remains an open question, but because the Laurentians are not “populist,” they have significant levers at their disposal if they wish to employ them.
Let's say young Indians coming up through the Canadian educational system see the value in learning French to get on certain career tracks, then that hurdle can be overcome. Even more threatening, the young are put on this path as a part of a tribal strategy to infuse the bureaucracy with their own.
There are painstaking mechanisms in place in the Canadian administrative state to avoid bias in hiring. I'm wondering how the Indians are kept out. Are you suggesting that there is more to the hiring process than meets the eye?
There is a certain segment of the Indian immigrant community, the high achieving strivers, who will be willing to learn French and all that, but typically they have chosen the STEM path for success. And I do think that there is enough under the surface prejudices at work across business and government so as to retain control. But that cannot hold forever if they do nothing. It’s early, and much remains uncertain, but I do think that if the Laurentians begin acting to curb immigrant influence, they will have the support of the people.
How, exactly, do we know the Laurentians don't have the stomach for forced remigration and deportations? They had plenty of stomach to ruin the lives of hundreds of thousands of children with lockdowns. They had plenty of stomach to build quarantine camps. They had plenty of stomach for mass arrests and beatings during the truck protest.
I don't think we have enough evidence yet to decide where things stand here, but rejecting out of hand the idea that the Laurentian Elite have the capacity to be cruel is to mistake them for other, softer, global Progressives.
Now explain how the Laurentians, having fully supported and encouraged the Trudeau regime and its policies of unchecked and unvetted immigration, have now seen the errors of their ways. I’ll wait…
Things change. Situations change. Elites do not maintain power over time without being able to adapt. They made an error. On the surface it looks like we are seeing early signs that they are recognizing this. It could be all fake and gay. But there are pieces appearing here and there, one recently in the Economist of all places, that are beginning to make the case against immigration. If the international set have begun to pivot as well it will make the job of the Laurentian’s pivot easier because they will not be going up against elite opinion elsewhere. And their participation in making it happen in the first place will just be memory holed. This is how power works. Can they pull it off? Is it real? Much remains uncertain, but it is clear that something is changing and has been for a while. I have been picking up on signals and writing about this since last year.
Well said BH.
England has already lost the battle. I'd like to think someone in Canada has a plan to avoid the same fate.
I don’t think its too late for England. It might be too late to do something without there being violence, but I still hold out some small hope for the future of the West, England included.
I don’t, (have hope) we’ve passed the post, the west has drowned itself and the newbies have no reason to assimilate. It’s numbers, to many in to short a time, it’s their country now.
On a more positive note, I am usually wrong on this stuff, so…
Torontonian
I don't know if you've been to Canada, but it looks exactly like videos that Englishmen post to demonstrate the state of English cities. Canada is demographically like London, basically everywhere now.